It is NOT enabling substance use or encouraging drug use. It does not promote or endorse use; it accepts that use is occurring and works to minimize its dangerous consequences.
It is NOT ignoring addiction. It actively engages with individuals struggling with addiction by providing compassionate support, health services, and a pathway to further treatment when they are ready.
It is NOT teaching people how to use drugs. The focus is solely on providing life-saving public health information to make existing use less dangerous, such as how to prevent overdose or disease transmission.
It is NOT unethical. Its core principles—saving lives, reducing suffering, and treating people with dignity—are fundamentally ethical and humane.
It Saves Lives: It directly reduces the risk of death through overdose prevention and access to naloxone..
It Meets People Where They Are: It does not require abstinence to receive help, removing a major barrier to care for many.
It Keeps the Door Open: Providing support without judgment keeps the door open for communication. This approach strengthens community connections and creates opportunities for individuals to pursue treatment and recovery when they are ready.
It Enhances Public Safety: Harm reduction programs serve as hubs to connect people with medical care, and other social services. They are proven, cost-effective methods of disease prevention and do not increase substance use.
Both approaches are valid and important parts of a complete healthcare system.
They simply have different primary goals and methods.
Principle | Abstinence-Based Recovery | Harm Reduction |
Definition of Success | Complete cessation of all non-prescribed | Reduced risks and negative consequences associated with substance use (including continued use) |
Primary Goal | Lifelong Sobriety | Improved health, safety, and well being – regardless of ongoing substance use |
Approach to Use | Substance use is seen as inherently problematic and to be stopped entirely | Substance use is seen on a spectrum; focus is on reducing harm rather than eliminating use |
Engagement | Often requires commitment to abstinence as a condition of participation | Welcome individuals regardless of whether they are ready or willing to stop using |
Philosophy of Readiness | Assumes that recovery begins with the decision to stop using | Meets people where they are and supports any positive change |
Common Programs/Models | 12-Step programs (e.g., AA/NA), therapeutic communities, residential treatment | Medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD), overdose prevention, housing-first models |
View of Relapse | Often seen as a failure or setback | Viewed as part of the process and an opportunity for continued support |
Role of the Individual | Encouraged to admit powerlessness over substances | Encouraged to make empowered decisions about their health and use |
Spirituality and Peer | Frequently includes a spiritual or peer-based recovery community | May include peer support, but not necessarily spiritual or abstinence-based |
Stigma and Inclusion | May unintentionally exclude those who are not abstinent | Intentionally inclusive and nonjudgmental, especially toward those actively using substances |
Created by
President and CEO Liberation Programs, Inc. – Bridgeport, CT
John.Hamilton@liberationprograms.org
Chief Clinical Officer Liberation Programs, Inc. – Bridgeport, CT
Joanne.Montgomery@liberationprograms.org